When we look at narrative texts, the communication structure
is similar to the Basic Communication Model. The sender (author) wants to communicate a message (story) to
someone else (reader/audience). He does that by telling or writing down his
message.
The question now is, “Where will we find the meaning of the
message?” Does the meaning of the story lie with the author (what he/she
intended), in the text itself or with the reader? (See diagram below) My vote is with the author;
he is after all the one who have the message and knows what he wants to
communicate. Furthermore, in terms of the Bible, he is the ‘inspired’ author of
God’s message. If I want to study God as a character in a story, my purpose
would be to come to an understanding of how the author intended the reader to
understand who God is and what he is like. Unfortunately, we do not have the
author with us to verify whether we understand what he meant when he wrote his
story neither do we have a commentary (written by the author) to explain
exactly what he meant.
Another way to go is to ask, “What did the original readers
of the text understood the message to be?” After all, besides the author, they
would have understood the story best as the message was intended for them. They
best understood the code the author used to communicate his message with and shared
a common frame of reference (context) with the author. Unfortunately, once
again, we do not have the readers of the text with us to explain what they
would have understood the message to be. Furthermore, we do not have any guarantee
that they understood perfectly what the author intended.
Although we do want to understand what the author intended
with his writing and it would be great to understand what the original
receivers understood the message to be, the only ‘thing’ we have is the text. The
problem with the text is that, because we are so distanced from its origins
(few can read it in its original language and most have nothing more than a vague, if any, understanding of the ancient world), we can easily misunderstand
the message and the author’s intention. In addition, it is too easy for us to
hear from the text the message that we would like to hear. As Long (1999, p.
88) observes, “In this day and age, it
would be the height of hermeneutical naïveté to deny or ignore the fact that one’s
background beliefs have a significant impact on how one processes and assesses
data.”
Still, that is what we are left with, the text – God’s Word –
and, should we want to understand its (his) message to us, we need to go about
it in a responsible manner. “What we must do is identify elements in the
text that plausibly ground our interpretations” (Walsh,
2009, p. 5)
[author’s emphasis]. Thus, we need to make every effort to understand the text
for what it is and what it wants to communicate.
Long, V. P. (1999). Old Testament History: A Hermeneutical
Perspective, in: VanGemeren, W. A. (Ed.), A guide to Old Testament theology
and exegesis: an introductory articles from the New International dictionary of
Old Testament theology and exegesis, (pp. 83–99). Grand Rapids Mich.: Zondervan.
Walsh, J. T. (2009). Old Testament Narrative: a Guide to Interpretation.
Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press.
What happens to your preference for the author's intention in the light of our contextual and existential presuppositions that influence the way in which we interpret the text? Can we ever recover the author's intention?
ReplyDeleteThanks for your reply
ReplyDeletePresuppositions would be a topic for discussion on its own. I guess I still need to look into it in detail on my blog. I did however touch on the issue in some of my previous blogs - "'High' view of God - Divine accommodation" and "'High' view of God - Harmonising the text". I also mention above that that would be my preference and the ideal but is something that will always evades us as we do not have the author with us to verify what we think he wants to communicate. I will deal with the issue of the author some time soon.
Can we ever recover his intention? I guess only in so far the text allows us knowing that even with our best endeavors it will always evade us - we will never come to a point where we will be able to say we now know his intention. That does not, however, keep us from, in terms of what the text reveals, try and come to (preliminary) conclusions of his intentions.