When we
think about the God of the Bible, we are confronted with at least two major
issues (see my previous blogs): the one being the perceived contradiction between the God of the Old Testament
and the God of the New Testament. The other would be the conflict between the
narrator’s portrayal of God and readers’ theology. These issues are not to be
taken lightly, as the way God is perceived to be (the kind of God we believe in)
not only have a huge influence on believers’ faith and practise, but believers
might end up believing in an altogether different God than the one we meet in
the Bible.
The reality is that
the text of the Old Testament, at least, does not deal with God, or theology,
in a systematic manner. The fact is that most of the Old Testament consists of
narratives – stories. What we know about God and his actions (who and how he is), we derive from
these stories. And, as Wenham (1987:144) says, “…theological systematization is hardly the
concern of the biblical narrators”. The authors of the Old Testament narratives
did not intend to write theology. They wrote down the stories about God’s
journey with his people that were passed down from generation to generation.
When we read the
paper, we read the front page in a different way than the cartoons or sport
pages. When we read the Bible, we need to distinguish the different types of
literature. We cannot read narratives in the same way we read the Psalms or
Paul’s letters. Different genres have different rules by which they are written
and by which they should be interpreted.
As Fokkelman (1999:19) says, “What we have to learn is to read these stories
according to their own rules and conventions, in an attitude of respect, and
maintaining an open mind as long as possible."
No comments:
Post a Comment