As I noted in my previous article, we do not read the front page
of the newspaper in the same way we read the cartoons or sport pages. We also
do not read a scientific book in the same manner than a storybook. The first
wants to convey ‘objective’ facts whereas the second wants to involve and draw
the reader in to a world created by the author of the narrative.
So, when we read any part of the Bible, we first have to ask
ourselves what type of literature (genre) we are dealing with. Each genre should
be read according to its own rules and conventions. Human (2003:271) emphasises the fact that the Bible consists
of numerous literary genres and “Each [genre] expresses the truth in a
different way. These genres are not interpreted in the same way. Cognizance is
therefore expected from the reader to read literary types in a differentiated
manner” [my translation]. The interpreter should thus not only be able to
identify a passage’s genre but also know which ‘keys’ unlocks the particular
genre (Human
2011:70).
When we read a Psalm we should understand how poetry works in
order appreciate what the psalmist wanted to communicate. When we read
narratives, we need to understand how stories work in order to comprehend what
the author’s purpose was in telling the story. In the end, we want to know what
the message of a particular passage is because we believe it to be God’s Word. If
we read a narrative passage as if it is systematic theology we might end up
missing the message (God’s) altogether. Priority should be given to what the text wants to communicate
with due consideration to the rules and conventions of the genre one is dealing
with (Gorman
2009:84).
Should we agree with this, does it then mean that we can / should read the first number of books of the bible (and the New Testament) as we would read any other story? Is it then possible to come to a better understanding of who and how God is by accepting that he is pretty much portrayed as a character in a story?
No comments:
Post a Comment